Sunderland Rumours Archive August 13 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us sunderland transfer rumours.

13 Aug 2014 21:02:53
Nearly kick off time: here are my league predictions.

Top Four:
1. Chelsea
2. Man City
3. Arsenal
4. Man city

12. Sunderland

17. Hull
18. West Brom
19. Burnley
20. Aston Villa

Believable2 Unbelievable8

I know man city have got enough good players to field two teams capable of top four finishes but i don't think the premier league would allow it

Agree8 Disagree1

4. Man utd

Blooming key board

Agree1 Disagree2

Talk about squad depth

Agree1 Disagree1

13 Aug 2014 19:06:03
amazin how a few days can make u feel (hopefully)
borini should sign in 48 hrs
buckley havin medical now
w ham end interest in wickham (does that indicate staying?)
not heard owt on richards so did jcfulwell start a betting spree on this site to get the odds cut from 28/1 to 5/4?? wots hapnin jc?

Believable3 Unbelievable5

All I know is Sunderland have held talks with his agent and they went well

Agree2 Disagree4

And he has shortened to 8/11

Agree2 Disagree1

JCFULWELL - If Richards signs I am officially only listening to your roomers from now on!

I agree with all of the original league positions for top 4 and us.

My bottom 3 though are
18. Hull
19. Swansea
20. Burnley

Think Manchester United will be not as good as people think. Either 5th / 6th for me, not really challenging the top 4, their defence is arguable worse than last year! - No Rio, No Vidic, No Evra and now Shaw out for 4 weeks already. Jones / Smalling don't look top 4 material and if anyone gets injured they have little back up

Agree2 Disagree2

13 Aug 2014 17:48:23
I reckon if Buckley signs might help borini deal go through, because reckon borini wants assurances that he won't be played on the wing. Can see starting line up being

Manone
Jones (Richards if we get him)
O'Shea (Van Djik if we get him)
Brown
Van Annholt
Cattermole
Rodwell
Buckley
Giacherini
Johnson
Wickham/Flecther (Borini if we get him)

Believable1 Unbelievable7

Lets hope buckley is better than bridcutt because he's usless

Agree3 Disagree9

{Ed024's Note - A little harsh......but I prefer Catts}

14 Aug 2014 01:32:01
Catts is better but saying Bridcutt is useless is not fair. he is driven, passionate and isn't afraid to tell more experienced players, eg. O'Shea what they are doing wrong. which is a rarity in football. I think Catts needs to perform this year because Bridcutt is serious competition.

Agree8 Disagree2

14 Aug 2014 01:39:23
Buckley is an old fashioned winger and scores goals. hopefully hell do it for us in the Premiership!. bit harsh on Bridcutt but this season is important for him as he's been dogged by injuries!. yes ed Catts is the best . if he can stay on the field!.

Agree6 Disagree0

I don't think bride tut is useless, he came into a side bottom of the league dead on our feet going nowhere but down. I think this season we will see why gus bought him. With the addition of Buckley it may help him to settle a bit. I also think altidore and roberge will be better this year after their initial first season.

Agree1 Disagree0

Lets not forget those 5 games at the end of last season that kept us up. bridcutt didn't play in any of them, if he had we would have gone down. he came in for injured catts against swansea and we lost. an injury free catts makes safc tick / drives us on.
ps we need a center half desperatly.

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Aug 2014 17:32:53
I think we're missing a trick here. Our transfer policy seems a bit random with no real direction.
Borini and Buckley for a combined £16.5 million. For an untried championship player and a Liverpool reserve who clearly doesn't want to come. Don't get me wrong, I like borini, and Buckley may turn out ok, but we can get so much more for £16.5 million that would improve our team much more than these two.
Micah Richards is available, and pellegrini said today that Scott Sinclair was too. £10 million double bid for two players City want rid of? It's a possibility, especially considering Richards only has a year left on his contract. And spurs have said Townsend and Dawson are available too. They want O'Shea, so player plus £6-7 million maybe (they apparently value O'Shea at £3 million according to the papers so that takes it to £10 million in total). That works out at just a bit more than borini and Buckley would cost, but would give us 4 players with premier league experience and more importantly would address our glaring need for central defenders and wingers. Who would you rather have really? Townsend or Buckley? I just can't understand the club's fixation with Borini. We tried, it didn't work out, move on. Please. He's a 10-15 goal a season player, surely between them fletcher, wickham, Johnson, Sinclair, Townsend could get that many

Believable6 Unbelievable8

I totally agree it's frustrating being a Sunderland fan! Richards would be a quality signing and he knows rodwell and Johnson from his city days so bed in well

Agree2 Disagree0

13 Aug 2014 23:03:32
I agree that Townsend has many of the qualities we need- especially the pace to unsettle defenders. But I am not sure that both him and Johnson can be accommodated in the same team unless we have a defenders who are less prone to errors and also have more pace, as we would effectively have only six outfield players when not in possession. But I would certainly expect Dawson and Richards to add more to the team than Borini- and they would still be around next year, when our ageing centrebacks will need to be replaced anyway. If we could get either Borini or Townsend, Dawson and Richards for a net outlay of £14m- which would you prefer?

Agree3 Disagree0

The fees may be the same, but the salaries would be much, much greater. Plus, Poyet puts a lot of value on Borini being familiar with the style and team. Don't get me wrong, I'm quite sick of the Borini "saga". Way past the time to move on, I say. And although it would be nice to turn that into several players, I think that putting £14m towards another striker/winger that would get us more goals than Borini's 10 and actually wants to come here is the better move. Just my opinion, though. Not worth much

P. S. I'm actually quite optimistic about Fletcher, Wickham (if he stays), AJ, and even Altidore pulling their weight this term. Could just be annual pre-season optimism, but I feel things could start to work up front this season.

Agree2 Disagree0

14 Aug 2014 02:03:29
I agree with a lot said here but we all seem to be forgetting one thing. Daniel Levy.

Look at what we had to go through with him to sign Darren Bent and how much that "spurs reserve" wound up costing us. I highly doubt he would let 2 players who had moderately good seasons last year leave for the £9m we would be left with should we sign Richards which I've already said should be our top priority.

They would both likely cost around £7m, probably even more for Townsend because of how overpriced attacking players are.

As for Scott Sinclair. I think he is Poyet's last resort should his attempts to sign Borini fail. Don't think Poyet believes Buckley is the solution to the problem. I like Poyet know that Buckley is just solid back up incase players get injured over the season.

All in all I would love to have Townsend and Dawson at the club but would easily cost around £18m not £14m.

But I maintain this. we MUST sign Micah Richards. He ticks so many boxes for us. If we only sign one more player this window it MUST be Richards. we have prem standard cover everywhere but defence and Richards can play anywhere and so provides this.

Agree4 Disagree0

14 Aug 2014 02:11:15
Also we still have a fair amount of money to through around. would anyone object to us signing Borini, Dawson and Richards. It would cost around £25m but I think its safer business. I don't think Borini cares if he is on the wing just as long as he plays.

Agree4 Disagree1

13 Aug 2014 13:35:27
Had a 2.5 million bid for Brighton's Will Buckley accepted.

Now for the hardest part, getting the players to sign their contract. (hopefully should be relatively straightforward as Buckley and Poyet have worked together, we can offer better wages and a chance to play in the premier league)

Believable5 Unbelievable1